.

ESPLOST Now SRSPLOST?

A look at what's in the ESPLOST that will come before voters in March.

The holidays are over, the kids are returning to school, and parents are back at work. The General Assembly has convened to discuss matters of importance related to our great state... but in the mean time there are issues right here in Cobb that we need to look at. One of these is the upcoming vote on the E-SPLOST. But perhaps it should be renamed.

So let's start with a pretty basic question. What does E-SPLOST stand for? It's supposed to be an Educational Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax. Essentially, it is a means by which we are allowed to levy on ourselves a 1 percent sales tax to fund capital expenditures needed or wanted by our school system.

However, the proposed project list put forth by the Cobb County School District appears to be moving away from education and more towards sports and recreation. I understand that sports and cultural arts are perhaps important to some - but am I the only one that finds it odd that the proposal has 3 times as much allotted for new gymnasiums and theaters as it does for the entire "Instructional / Learning Resources / Textbooks" category?  

And $121.8 million for gymnasiums and theaters versus $40 million for learning resources? (I didn't even include the 5% contingency funds, 10% fees, $10M for gymnasium lighting upgrades, $4.5M for track resurfacing, $1M for tennis courts, or $1M for athletic field electrical projects here.)

Unless we're aiming to raise a generation of NBA stars and Julia Roberts, perhaps we should look at better educating our kids first. Sure, Cobb has some fantastic schools - Lassiter, Pope, and Walton fall in the top 10 in School Digger's rankings.

But overall, Cobb ranks 34th out of the 164 school districts in this state (which is ranked 48th in the nation) and includes (out of 367 high schools) McEachern at 138, Pebblebrook at 161, and South Cobb at 190. Beyond that, some of our elementary schools are ranking in the 800s out of the 1161 elementary schools in the state.

Compton Elementary in Powder Springs, for instance, shows 51.4% of the school met the standard on the CRCT for 3rd grade science. Do you think perhaps we could take some of the money allotted for secondary gyms and use it to better educate our kids?

Wait, what's that? Secondary gyms? Yes, you read that correctly. I had the opportunity recently to meet with a small group from the Cobb County School District, including Dr. Hinojosa and board members Scott Sweeney and David Banks. While our conversations were pleasant and congenial, I have to disagree with them over the strategy here.  

You see, our high schools in this county from what I was told have a main gymnasium and an auxiliary gymnasium. So we'll build these new main gymnasiums, the current main gymnasium will become the auxiliary gymnasium and we'll tear down the old auxiliary gymnasium.

So letting my curiosity continue here, I had to ask if two gyms at every high school were really necessary. After all, I graduated from Parkview High School (a Gwinnett school, also one of the best in the state at the time) not that many years ago where we only had one gym. The response?  There are scheduling issues where there is sometimes a demand for the gym by more than one group at a time.  

Upon suggesting that perhaps the groups unable to use the gym could possibly go outside was met with "well then you can deal with the calls from the parents." Am I to understand that parents out there are really saying our kids are no longer able to play outside? Yes, I understand some days are cold or hot or whatever... but I don't see that as a deterrent from telling kids that they're too fragile to get out there and play.

So while I support furthering education of our kids, I just don't see enough of that coming from this particular proposal. I urge each of you to vote NO in March and let's re-work this Sports and Recreation Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax into a true Educational Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax that we can all support.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Concerned parent January 15, 2013 at 06:48 PM
I happen to agree with you 100%, although I would like to also point out the lack of funding proposed for technology upgrades, the TRUE need for proper maintenance and upgrades for existing school structures that were constructed in the 1950's, and overcrowding issues in certain portions of the county that require portable units be used for years and years to house students. Take a look at the counties older school buildings and I'm sure you will find issues that range from drafty windows or malfunctioning HVAC systems, all the way through restroom facilities that are to the point of dilapidation with sewage leaks. I propose that these school board members actually TOUR EVERY SCHOOL IN THIS COUNTY, note the REAL issues faced by teachers, administration and students every day in buildings that are old, small, outdated and many times UNSAFE and then rework the list of needs based on ACTUAL needs.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something